Crawl overview and statistics
Keep the crawl's scope and setup beside the report so missing coverage is not mistaken for a healthy site.
Bounded crawl
Traceable evidence
Comparable verification
Begin with run state and coverage
Overview combines the selected run's published Site Health, issue totals, categories, URL distribution, crawl outcomes, HTTP classes, recent health points, and severity movement. It is an orientation layer, not a root-cause report.
- Confirm that secondary publication finished.
- Compare requested, discovered, admitted, crawled, skipped, failed, and still-waiting scope.
- Check whether summary counts are present and exact enough for the claim.
- Open the issue group or URL set behind the visible pattern.
Read the score with its publication state
Site Health is a 0 to 100 display derived from a versioned basis-point calculation. Four categories are required for publication: crawlability and availability, indexability and canonicalization, content and metadata, and links and architecture. Structured and international, performance and resources, and security and protocol contribute when eligible evidence exists.
Confidence is the minimum of primary coverage, category coverage, and materialization coverage. Below 70 percent confidence the score is not published; 70 to below 85 percent is provisional; 85 percent or more is measured when the other publication rules pass.
Understand what the score weights
| Category | Current weight |
|---|---|
| Crawlability and availability | 25% |
| Indexability and canonicalization | 20% |
| Content and metadata | 15% |
| Links and architecture | 15% |
| Structured and international | 10% |
| Performance and resources | 10% |
| Security and protocol | 5% |
Do not compare incompatible health points
A health delta is comparable only when score, ruleset, eligibility, and scope fingerprints match; both runs are measured; materialization is exact; neither evidence set is truncated; and primary coverage differs by no more than five percentage points.
If those conditions fail, compare the underlying issue, URL, and coverage evidence instead of inventing a trend from two colored numbers.
Separate discovered, admitted, and processed URLs
Discovered is everything the run found. Admitted is the bounded set accepted under host, patterns, depth, robots, and URL cap. Crawled, skipped, failed, and waiting describe what happened inside the accepted set. External links and resources have separate secondary counters.
Use Statistics as a reproducible lens
Statistics can scope the whole run or the largest stored directory, segment, locale, host, and template aggregates. It shows response classes, crawl outcomes, click depth, discovery source, indexability, internal-link weakness, structured-data adoption, canonicals, hreflang, response time, and HTML size when those counters exist.
Host and locale scope cards do not pretend to have a matching Page Explorer filter. Directory, segment, and template scopes can hand off their matching filter.
Interpret click depth and link weakness carefully
Click depth is a retained internal-link-path projection from the seed. Start, one, two, three, four to five, six or more, unreachable, and not-linked states are distinct. Not linked is not zero clicks, and deep-page share excludes unknown and unreachable states from its known-path denominator.
Weak internal links currently means at most one incoming internal link. It is a screening condition, not proof that the page lacks authority or should receive a link from every template.
Investigate an unusual depth or link pattern in the page and link evidence, including both ends of the relationship.
A technical state is not automatically a defect
Noindex, canonical-to-other, missing structured data, absent hreflang, redirects, and large HTML can all be intentional. Statistics reports their measured distribution. The issue catalog and page context decide whether a rule was actually triggered.
For markup findings, use structured-data validation to separate a syntax or property issue from rich-result eligibility.
Check Google Index evidence separately from crawl indexability
Google Index shows saved URL inspections from the connected Google Search Console property alongside the selected site's crawl facts. Connect the matching property, inspect the relevant URLs, and check the inspection date and reported last crawl before comparing results.
Indexed, not indexed, and unknown describe the stored inspection verdict. Missing or unknown evidence does not prove that a URL is absent from Google. A successful crawl response does not prove indexing, and this view does not submit indexing requests.
Keep fetch timing separate from user performance
Statistics groups server response time under 0.5 seconds, 0.5 to 1.5 seconds, and above 1.5 seconds, plus downloaded HTML size under 100 KB, 100 to 512 KB, and above 512 KB. These are crawl observations, not Core Web Vitals.
The Performance view owns available CrUX field data, PageSpeed or Lighthouse lab evidence, coverage mode, URL sampling, diagnostics, and retry state.
Missing older counters stay missing
Statistics trends use up to ten recent runs with materialized summaries. Markup and performance panels appear only when their availability markers exist. Older runs that predate a counter are omitted instead of being plotted as a false zero.
Move from a distribution to a testable finding
Example: A deep blog archive
Statistics scoped to the blog directory show a large share of pages at six or more clicks from the start page, and a group marked not linked.
The team opens Page Explorer with the matching filter, samples URLs across years and finds that older posts are reachable only through paginated archives. Better internal links become the next task.
Frequently asked questions
How is the Site Audit health score weighted?
Crawlability and availability 25 percent, indexability and canonicalization 20, content and metadata 15, links and architecture 15, structured and international 10, performance and resources 10, security and protocol 5.
Are the response times Core Web Vitals?
No. Response time and HTML size groups are the crawler's own observations. Core Web Vitals come from field data and are shown separately where available.
Can I compare the health score of two crawls?
Only when both runs use the same scoring rules and scope, are fully measured and not truncated, and have similar coverage. Otherwise the difference may come from the crawl, not the site.